Friday, February 22, 2019

Case Brief Essay

Mr. David R. Bullock filed an appeal from his convictions for attempted statutory dishonor, and attempted sexual exploitation of a minor. David R. Bullock put himself in numerous conversations via email and chat rooms with a Newton County deputy Sheriff who was conducting a sting operation against pedophiles. The Deputy took on a component part of a thirteen year old female by the differentiate of Ashley Anne. Many of the conversations that took place amidst Mr. Bullock and Ashley were of a sexual nature. During conversations surrounded by Mr. Bullock and Ashley, he discussed how he would like to engage in genuine acts (sexual) with her and her friends (girls of younger age) and how he would like to video those acts. He informed Ashley that the conversations active reaching with her and her friends should non be discussed because it was non legal for them to fulfill. Eventually a meeting was scheduled for a time and a place to meet and specific instructions were given to Ashley on how the meeting should take place. Ashley was told that upon her reach to the stipulate location, she should meet Mr. Bullock in a specific arena of that location.HistoryOn October 18, 2002, Mr. Bullock and the decoy Ashley were present at the specified location, along with computer and video equipment in his vehicle, which ultimately leads to the arrest of Mr. Bullock. At the time of the arrest, Mr. Bullock did not deny having conversations with Ashley but explained that if she would arrive, he vertical wanted her to be counseled by the authorities on the dangers of meeting strangers on the internet. Mr. Bullock argues that his case is a case of entrapment and that he took no unanimous steps towards committing the crimes he has been charged with. IssueThe sufficiency of the test is challenged and appellant claims an entrapment defense for the reason that he was not predisposed to engage in the charged offenses, we shall set forth in greater detail a series of sordid internet and telephone communications between appellate and thepurported3 victim than we usually would.HoldingFirst, plaintiff in error does not convey that he committed the crimes for which he was convicted and, second, there is no evidence that appellant was not predisposed, ready and willing to commit these crimes. plaintiff in error did not meet his burden of injecting into the case a proper case for entrapment.RationalAppellant tendered four jury instructions alleging the affirmative defense of entrapment. Appellant cites to the evidence that Ashley induced Appellant to take the substantial step of committing the crimes of statutory rape and sexual exploitation of a minor when he was not other than so inclined. Appellant contends that he was only willing to express his fantasies, which was not a crime he was charged or convicted of, and he was not willing to act upon his fantasies without the inducement by Ashley. He notes that Ashley initiated the majority of contacts with Appellant specifically, he claims Ashley initiated seventeen of the nineteen instant messages and four of the eight e-mails between her and Appellant. Appellant indicated the portions of the conversations where Ashley first proposed that Appellant come to Diamond and persisted in act to set a firm date he claims he was loath(p) to act on his desires. Appellants claim that he would not have committed the charged offenses but for the enticement by Ashley is not supported by the evidence.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.